In his 'A Response to J P Holding's Review of John MacArthur’s “Slave"' Ed Dingess, a self proclaimed Christian, has once again engaged in lying to achieve his own personal goals. And, once more, with pretense to doing "good works unto the praise of God's glory," as if lying is anything approximating "goods works."
He has been exposed as a liar doing other very un-Christian acts, elsewhere.
See the website http://www.tektonics.org/eddingess.html and decide for yourself just how much credence you want to lend into anything he is saying here:
http://reformedreasons.blogspot.com/2011/10/response-to-j-p-holdings-review-of-john.html?showComment=1319261585858#c4162956093750276748
For example, Ed Dingess is misrepresenting JP Holding by stating, "Holding has a strong affinity . . . for . . . scholars who subscribe to sociological interpretation as their primary interpretive model." because JP Holding has stated in another post on his webforum, where Dingess lodged his pesky complaints, ". . . I use social science in an interdisciplinary way . . ." [1]
Ed Dingess: A lover of falsehood.
[1] theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?148145-An-Open-Challenge-to-Norman-Geisler&p=3307098#post3307098 (the sixth quote responded to)
1 comment:
This is pretty good stuff! My compliments.
Post a Comment